Mumbai Developer Ordered to Compensate Homebuyer with INR 8,50,000

user Admin
  • 31st Mar 2024
  • 1341
  • 0
Mumbai Developer Ordered to Compensate Homebuyer with INR 8,50,000
Never miss any update
Join our WhatsApp Channel

Mumbai Developer Ordered to Compensate Homebuyer with INR 8,50,000 for initiating redevelopment without proper authorizations

In a significant ruling, a Mumbai consumer commission has mandated a development firm to compensate a homebuyer, Neela Pawar, with INR 8.5 lakh and refund INR 7.5 lakh due to its failure in acquiring the necessary permits for a redevelopment project in Kandivli. This decision highlights the repercussions of initiating redevelopment without proper authorizations.

The Case

Neela Pawar, who sought to purchase an additional flat in 2011 within the redevelopment project by Zirkon International, was left stranded when the firm terminated the contract, citing construction infeasibilities, and subsequently withheld her payment. The commission found the developer guilty of not securing the required permissions, deceiving Pawar, a senior citizen who had invested her retirement funds.

Commission's Verdict

The commission, acknowledging Pawar's ordeal, awarded her compensation for mental anguish and the harassment endured. It emerged that Pawar, through an RTI inquiry, discovered the developer's failure to obtain construction permissions from relevant authorities, revealing the firm's deliberate omission of crucial information.

Unveiling the Truth

Further investigations revealed that the redevelopment agreement was executed without adhering to the directives issued by the Ministry of Defence regarding construction restrictions on the land. This act of non-disclosure and engaging in redevelopment without the necessary sanctions led to the commission accusing Zirkon International of engaging in unfair practices.

Conclusion

Initiated in October 2014, this case against Zirkon International and Om Shiv Ashish Co-op Housing Society underscores the vital importance of transparency and adherence to legal requirements in redevelopment projects. The ruling serves as a caution for developers about the consequences of bypassing regulatory mandates.


Related Topics / Tags

Admin

Author

Admin

...


Comments

Add Comment

No comments yet.

Add Your Comment

Relevant Blogs

Legal
Can Insolvency Code Reforms Transform Real Estate Resolutions for Homebuyers?

The proposed reforms to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) aim to tackle long-standing ch

Legal
5 Reasons Property Owners Must Stay Compliant with Capital Gains Tax in Builder Deals

1. Joint Development Agreements (JDAs) Under the Tax Lens The Income Tax (I-T) department is closely scrutinizing landowners who entered into Joint D

Legal
Bombay HC Orders Municipalities to Integrate Websites with MahaRERA for Real-Time Certificate Verification

The Bombay High Court has instructed all municipal corporations, councils, and urban local authorities in Maharashtra to integrate their websites with